Cognitive appraisals of specialty mental health services and their relation to mental health service utilization in the rural population
by Deen, Tisha Lee, Ph.D., UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS, 2010, 60 pages; 3421031

Abstract:

Until now, research on mental health service utilization in rural populations has focused on environmental barriers, sociodemographic barriers, and cultural barriers to seeking mental health care; considerably less attention has focused on cognitive appraisals such as individual perceptions of need, outcome expectancies and outcome value. Demographic and environmental characteristics, cultural perceptions of seeking help for emotional problems, cognitive appraisals, and current psychiatric symptoms were assessed in one model that predicted mental health service utilization in a rural sample. There were several hypotheses proposed: (1) Psychiatric symptoms will be positively related to mental health service utilization; (2) There would be higher utilization for medical care versus specialty mental health care; (3) There would be a higher perception of need and outcome expectancy for primary care than for specialty mental health care; (4) A higher number of environmental barriers would predict lower specialty mental health service utilization; (5) An increase in cultural barriers would predict lower specialty mental health utilization; and (6) Cognitive appraisals of specialty mental health care services would significantly predict specialty mental health care utilization above and beyond the effect of psychiatric symptoms, demographic variables, environmental barriers, and cultural barriers. The results of this study support the hypothesis that cognitive appraisals have an impact on the decision to seek specialty mental health services in a rural sample. Study findings, limitations, and implications are discussed.

 
AdviserTimothy Cavell
SchoolUNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS
SourceDAI/B 71-09, p. , Sep 2010
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsSocial research; Mental health; Social psychology; Public policy
Publication Number3421031
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3421031
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.