Literacy instruction orientation and practices, and self-efficacy in teachers
by Domingo, Jelia Roxanne, Ph.D., FORDHAM UNIVERSITY, 2010, 122 pages; 3420958

Abstract:

The problem investigated by this study was whether teachers of kindergarten through second grade feel themselves to be effective literacy teachers and if they do not feel effective, to find out whether their agreement or disagreement with the literacy methodologies required by the school was a factor. The mixed methods approach to this study involved participants' completion of the Teacher Perceptions About Early Reading and Spelling measure, Teacher Sense of Efficacy scale, and open ended questionnaire. Three of the participants then participated in 180 minutes of observations and a debriefing interview.

The majority of the participants in this study (24 out of 26) had a code-based/phonics literacy instruction orientation. As their school incorporated more whole language methodologies in their move toward balanced literacy, teachers expressed discomfort. Results of the Teacher Self-Efficacy scale seemed to indicate that all teachers had high self-efficacy. The open-ended questionnaire responses gave evidence of widespread disagreement with the literacy instruction mandates of the school and indicated that many teachers had lower self-efficacy than indicated on the Teacher Self-Efficacy scale. The observations and interviews of the three case study participants showed two responses to school requirements. One response was modified compliance in which teachers performed many of the tasks required, but spent the majority of class time using their preferred teaching methods. The pattern of responses in the interviews and open-ended questionnaires of these teachers indicated high self-efficacy in spite of strong disagreement with the school's literacy policy. The alternate response was complete compliance with evidence of lower teacher self-efficacy according to the open-ended questionnaire and interview.

The unanticipated finding in this study was how the level of fear of retribution from the administrative staff affected participation in the study. Several participants of the study informed the researcher that they had answered dishonestly on the Teacher Self-Efficacy scale because they were afraid that the principal would see their responses. The case study participants acknowledged feelings of intimidation but responded to it in different ways. This discrepancy appears to indicate that fear levels may have played a more important role in Teacher Self-Efficacy and teachers' acceptance of recently adopted literacy programs and methodologies than previously anticipated.

 
AdviserJoanna K. Uhry
SchoolFORDHAM UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/A 71-09, p. , Sep 2010
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsElementary education; Teacher education; Curriculum development
Publication Number3420958
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3420958
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.