Communities of practice: Understanding the factors contributing to enhanced knowledge sharing
by McElyea, B. E., Ph.D., WALDEN UNIVERSITY, 2010, 165 pages; 3418797

Abstract:

The knowledge management literature suggests that most communities of practice (CoP) are not adept at sharing what they learn with the larger organization. As a result, organizations experience duplication of effort and ad hoc learning. This organizational problem was examined through an exploratory case study of three CoP in a single organization. One CoP successfully shares what it learns with the larger organization. The question that served as the focus for this study involved understanding the factors that account for knowledge sharing in the successful CoP contrary to expectations and the practices of the two other CoP that were not successful. Knowledge management, learning organization, and organizational culture theories served as the theoretical foundations for the study. Interviews, direct, and indirect observations were triangulated as part of this analysis of the three CoP. Emerging patterns were examined through thematic coding of all data using Creswell's 8-step approach. Results indicated that leaders of CoP can influence knowledge sharing within CoP, relationships among CoP members can be leveraged to influence knowledge sharing with the larger organization, and people who join CoP tend to share what they learn more if their reasons for joining a community of practice are fulfilled. It is recommended that organizations understand where CoP operate in their organization, as they can be utilized as effective tools to engage a corporate-wide knowledge sharing strategy. This study may promote positive social change by improving organizational effectiveness via increased potential for utilizing intellectual capital leading to increased competitive and comparative advantage.

 
AdviserRuth Maurer
SchoolWALDEN UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/A 71-09, p. , Sep 2010
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsOrganization theory
Publication Number3418797
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3418797
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.