Student persistence in traditional and distance learning courses at two community colleges
by Blaine, Catherine K., Ph.D., UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, 2010, 128 pages; 3414206

Abstract:

This dissertation examines the relationship between mode of instructional delivery and course completion for students attending two community colleges. Course completion is defined as finishing the course with a grade of C or better, thus getting college credit and remaining in good academic standing. The research hypothesis is that distance learning students persist at equal or greater rates than their traditional classroom counterparts.

Using data for students enrolled at two local community colleges from the spring 2001 through spring 2003 semesters, the study compares completion rates for students in courses taught by television, Internet, or traditional classroom methods. In order to control for faculty characteristics, only courses that are taught via multiple methods in the same subject by the same full-time faculty member are included. The analyses also control for several student background characteristics.

Descriptive and multivariate statistics are used to examine the research questions. The analyses show that, at both community colleges, students were less likely to complete television courses than traditional classroom courses. At Suburban Community College, students in Internet courses were also less likely to complete their courses than students in traditional courses. The logistic regression also shows that several other variables are positively related to course completion at both community colleges: being older, female, White, a math/science major and a continuing rather than new student.

The findings have implications for faculty, college administrators and researchers. If academic administrators are to meet demands for higher course and program completion, then they should consider ways to improve outcomes for students in distance learning courses.

 
AdviserLaura W. Perna
SchoolUNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
SourceDAI/A 71-07, p. , Jul 2010
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsCommunity college education; Education policy; Educational technology; Higher education
Publication Number3414206
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3414206
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.