Assessing the malleability of student death penalty attitudes: An experimental test of the Marshall hypothesis
by Cox, Amanda K., Ph.D., INDIANA UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, 2010, 197 pages; 3413158

Abstract:

This experimental study examines the effects of various types of information about the death penalty on the attitudes of 362 undergraduate students at a university in the Northeast. This study attempts to expand upon previous research that has examined the malleability of student death penalty attitudes and, specifically, focuses on isolating the type of information most important to changing death penalty attitudes and examines the role that retributiveness and attitude strength may play in this relationship. Using a stratified cluster sampling procedure, self-administered pre- and post-tests were distributed to criminology and non-criminology students during February and March 2010. Vignettes, which included various types of information about the death penalty, were employed as an experimental stimulus.

The results from this study indicate that students who received information about socioeconomic discrimination in application of the death penalty and the high cost of the punishment were the most likely to exhibit change in their death penalty attitudes at post-test. Students who received information about wrongful capital convictions, racial discrimination in application of the death penalty, and the lack of a general deterrent impact of the punishment, as well as those who received information about all five of the death penalty factors, did not exhibit statistically significant change in their attitudes at post-test. However, the results also indicate that the type of information students received did not impact the degree of change in death penalty attitude between pre- and post-test. Likewise, it was found that the strength of a student’s death penalty attitude, as well as their level of retributiveness, did not explain the variance in death penalty attitude between pre- and post-test.

 
AdviserJamie S. Martin
SchoolINDIANA UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
SourceDAI/A 71-09, p. , Sep 2010
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsCriminology
Publication Number3413158
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3413158
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.