School identification and student perceptions of parent and teacher expectations: A closer look at the achievement gap between black males and females
by Rainey, Perry C., Ed.D., WALDEN UNIVERSITY, 2010, 107 pages; 3411945

Abstract:

Academic disidentification for black male students appears significantly greater than for black female students; however, there is a dearth of research addressing contributing factors for the gender discrepancy in academic disidentification by black adolescent students. Both structural and cultural explanations for this phenomenon suggested a closer examination of the role teachers and parents play in the way students identify with schooling. Cultural ecological theory and stereotype threat theory present two theoretical frameworks that help explain school identification by black adolescent students. This study examined the relationship between level of school identification (LSI) and students’ perceptions of parent (SPPE) and/or teacher (SPTE) expectations by black adolescents across gender lines. A quantitative research design used three surveys to collect and analyze data from 207 black adolescent students from an inner city urban high school. A one way ANOVA; a multiple regression; and a Z test comparing correlation coefficients were used to determine if there was a significant difference in SPPE and or SPTE acting as predictors of LSI for black adolescent males compared to black adolescent females. Findings suggest a significant difference in SPPE in relation to LSI between black males and black females is a major reason black males under perform in public schools and fail to graduate from high school with the necessary tools to be successful in college and in the workforce. Results from this study can be used to promote social change by helping to eliminate the achievement gap between black male students and black female students.

 
AdviserLatasha Jones
SchoolWALDEN UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/A 71-07, p. , Jul 2010
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsAfrican American studies; Educational administration; Secondary education; Gender studies
Publication Number3411945
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3411945
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.