Functional specialization of Romance verb polymorphy
by Barashkov, Andrei Nikolaevich, Ph.D., UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY, 2009, 157 pages; 3411142

Abstract:

This work, which is centered in the fields of descriptive and historical linguistics, traces the regularities in the development of alternative conjugation patterns for some of the most common Romance verbs with the basic meanings of BE, GO, HAVE, MUST, STAND, and WANT. Drawing on lesser known dialectal data primarily from Balkan and Italo-Romance domains, it demonstrates that the paradigms of the said verbs often exhibit an abundance of parallel (full/reduced/augmented/hybrid) forms, which sometimes establish close associations with the verbs' diverse (lexical/modal/auxiliary/presentative) functions. This complementary distribution of formal variants is referred to as functional polymorphy.

By reconstructing the verbs' grammaticalization trajectories from Latin to modern Romance and relating their functional expansion to their formal diversification, the work provides a hitherto unavailable unified account of phonetic, morphological, and syntactic processes responsible for the rise of overt functional marking in Romance. Thus, cross-dialectally similar phonetic reinforcement and erosion, morphemic loss and exchange, syntactic compounding between verbs, prepositions, and a limited number of deictic elements, are all shown to play their part in maintaining function-oriented divides between parallel paradigms. The dissertation also explores the strength of these barriers and concludes that in the majority of cases, they remain porous enough to allow at least some interchangeability of available variants, which reaches its limit when the reduced verb forms lose their original person and number inflections.

In conclusion, the main linguistic forces behind the rise and spread of functional polymorphy are identified as token frequency, repetition, pragmatic stress, and markedness, which links the present work to contemporary linguistic debates propelled by Bybee, Heine, Lehmann, and other grammaticalization specialists.

 
AdviserSteven Botterill
SchoolUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY
SourceDAI/A 71-06, Jul 2010
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsLinguistics
Publication Number3411142
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3411142
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.