A case study of a suburban high school's professional development program based on the National Staff Development Council standards
by Teague, Chad Michael, Ed.D., UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON, 2010, 128 pages; 3410773

Abstract:

Research has shown that teachers have the greatest impact on student learning more than any other factor (Haycock, 1998). Thus, highly qualified and effective teachers are the most important resource for schools and districts in order to educate all students. In a time of increased accountability and alternatively certified teachers, effective and relevant professional development for teachers is more important than ever. No Child Left Behind (Public Law 107-110) has increased the levels of accountability for all students and consequently, teachers and administrators. It has also set requirements for each campus to have highly qualified teachers in every classroom. If campuses are to meet these requirements and standards, a strong professional development program is necessary to provide teachers and administrators with the knowledge and resources necessary to educate all students. The National Staff Development Council has created twelve standards to assist teachers and administrators in creating a comprehensive professional development program. The standards include: Collaboration, Data-Driven, Design, Equity, Evaluation, Family Involvement, Leadership, Learning, Learning Communities, Quality Teaching, Research-Based, and Resources (NSDC, 2001). This research assesses the professional development program at a large suburban Texas high school. A survey of 143 teachers' perceptions on their campus professional development program was conducted. The data was analyzed to determine the perceived strengths, weaknesses, and possible constraints of the campus professional development program. Based on these outcomes, the researcher suggests ways to improve the existing program and make recommendations to the campus. The overall goal of this research is to create a greater awareness of the National Staff Development Council's standards for professional development and provide possible methods for improvement of campus professional development programs.

 
AdviserDoris Prater
SchoolUNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON
SourceDAI/A 71-06, p. , Jul 2010
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsPedagogy; Educational administration; Adult education; Secondary education
Publication Number3410773
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3410773
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.