The nature of feedback provided to elementary students by teachers in schools where grading and reporting are standards-based
by Souter, Dawn H., Ph.D., GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY, 2009, 115 pages; 3410738

Abstract:

Feedback is one of the most powerful influences on learning and achievement. Hattie (2002) found that the giving of quality feedback to students is one of the top five strategies teachers can use to improve student achievement. Research has confirmed that the right kind of feedback is essential for effective teaching and learning (McMillan, 2007). The University of Queensland (Australia) notes that feedback is the entity that brings assessment into the learning process (1998). The evidence also shows, however, that how feedback is given and the types of feedback given can provide disparate results with both achievement and student motivation. One mitigating factor to the giving and receiving of feedback in classrooms is a climate of evaluation, competition, rewards, punishments, winners and losers. In fact, research shows that while the giving of descriptive feedback enhances learning and motivation, the giving of norm-referenced grades has a negative impact on students (Bandura, 1993; Black & Wiliam, 1998; Butler & Nisan, 1986; Butler, 1987). This qualitative study used interviews, teacher observations, and document analysis to seek out the nature of feedback provided to students in a standards-based school district, where grading is standards-based rather than norm-referenced. The literature review suggests particular properties and circumstances that make feedback effective, and the researcher has used this research to analyze the oral and written feedback that teachers provide students. The analysis describes the use of feedback and feedback loops in these classrooms and the findings add to the current knowledge-base about the giving and receiving of feedback in standards-based schools and suggests areas for teacher improvement and development.

 
AdviserDonna A. Breault
SchoolGEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/A 71-07, p. , Jul 2010
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsEducational evaluation; Pedagogy; Elementary education
Publication Number3410738
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3410738
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.