Culture and community in online courses: A grid and group explanation
by Case, Stephoni Lynn, Ed.D., OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY, 2010, 242 pages; 3408702

Abstract:

Scope and method of study. Using Mary Douglas’ (1982) Grid and Group Typology, the purpose of this case study was to explain the distinctive patterns of student engagement, communication and community in the culture of four online courses. The participants were four online instructors and four of their students who completed online courses at Liberal Arts University in the summer of 2009. Interviews, observations and document analysis were used in both physical and virtual environments.

Findings and conclusions. The course participants of each course reflected a Bureaucratic/Authoritarian (high grid/low group) culture. Characteristic of the Bureaucratic/Authoritarian quadrant on the grid and group matrix, the individual, was limited in personal decisions and activities; personal autonomy was minimal as was group survival and/or influence. The students in each class finished strong with an attrition rate of less than ten percent, but there were varying degrees of collaboration in the discussion forums; quality of postings was directly related to the word count requirement from the instructors. The instructor’s methodology in using the discussion forum impacted students’ perceptions the value of the forums. Students also accommodated their instructors by converging to the method of communication demonstrated by the instructors. The findings also indicate that transferring an identical definition of culture from an onland environment to an online environment might be problematic, and that as online course culture theory develops, some elements in each culture may be different. Future studies of different types of courses offered in a traditional semester or at a different institution would be a positive addition to research. Also, further development of theory of culture in online courses is needed.

 
AdviserSusan Stansberry
SchoolOKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/A 71-07, p. , Jul 2010
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsSociology of education; Teacher education; Educational technology
Publication Number3408702
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3408702
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.