Unfit for bondage: Disability and African American slavery in the United States, 1800-1860
by Boster, Dea Hadley, Ph.D., UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, 2010, 353 pages; 3406224

Abstract:

Concepts of race and disability were mutually constituted in nineteenth-century American culture. Antebellum observers described racial differences in terms of physical or mental disability, particularly in the context of the slavery debate. African American bodies in bondage bore a "dual stigma" of blackness and physical or mental inferiority. Disability was also used as a metaphor on both sides of the slavery debate in the North and South—proslavery advocates claimed that African Americans were inherently disabled from participating in free society and required enslavement to thrive, whereas abolitionists argued that bondage itself was crippling to African Americans.

Disability featured prominently in many different aspects of slaveholding society. Assumptions about slave able-bodiedness or "soundness" were linked with ideas about manageability. Thus, behavioral expectations influenced how masters applied labels of disability to their human chattel, as well as what measures they used to control their bondspeople. However, slaveholders and other white authorities (including overseers, traders, prospective buyers, judges, and physicians) assessed and valued enslaved bodies in complicated ways, drawing on emotional or aesthetic reactions to "disabling" characteristics as well as more utilitarian considerations. Slaves also actively participated in disability "meaning making" projects at different sites in slave society, including plantations, auctions, courtrooms, and abolitionist propaganda. Many slaves strategically displayed, hid, exaggerated, or feigned disabilities to negotiate the terms of their bondage by avoiding labor, preventing undesirable sales, or attempting escape.

 
AdviserMartin S. Pernick
SchoolUNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN
SourceDAI/A 71-05, p. , May 2010
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsAfrican American studies; Black history; American history
Publication Number3406224
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3406224
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.