Impressions of competency in the workplace and the Shadow
by Haber, Julita A., Ph.D., TUI UNIVERSITY, 2010, 364 pages; 3405649

Abstract:

Making impressions of competency plays an important role in organizational life (Rosenfeld, Giacalone, & Riordan, 1995). Although expectations for showing competency are increasing in the marketplace (Heerwagen & Kampschroer, 2005), few studies have examined how workers respond to these collective pressures. This study empirically investigated how individuals cope with a competency image at work by examining the impact of social norms of showing competency and personal characteristic traits on fear of appearing incompetent and impression management behavior.

This study was grounded in the Shadow Theory (Fitzgerald & Oliver, 2006). The Shadow, integral to organizational life, refers to censored emotions or cognition unacceptable to one's view of the self (Kolodziejski, 2004). This study focused on the fear of appearing incompetent as the Shadow and applied the Shadow Theory to the impressions of competency context in the workplace to answer two research questions: how situational and personal factors contribute to the generation of the fear of appearing incompetent (the Shadow) and what effects of social norms of showing competency in the workplace and the fear of appearing incompetent are on impression management.

Cross-sectional research included two online surveys with a total of 644 responses from professionals working mostly in the management consulting and medical fields. A new instrument for measuring social norms of showing competency was developed and validated. Based on the conceptual model the hypotheses were only partially supported. However, an alternative model provided empirical support for the Shadow Theory and offered important insights for understanding impressions of competency in the workplace. Data analysis, detailed findings, study limitations, and contribution to research and practice are discussed.

 
AdviserStephen P. Fitzgerald
SchoolTUI UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/A 71-04, p. , May 2010
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsSocial psychology; Management; Occupational psychology; Personality psychology; Organizational behavior
Publication Number3405649
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3405649
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.