Assessing constructivist elements in the online learning environment
by Williamson, William Davis, Ed.D., THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL, 2010, 115 pages; 3403250

Abstract:

The purpose of this study was to develop and pilot test a methodology to determine the relative importance and presence of constructivist elements in online learning classes. A case study method was used to assess the effectiveness of four key constructivist elements: knowledge construction, collaborative learning, authentic learning and self-regulation in an online masters level public health course. Nine subjects responded to two survey instruments, while six subjects participated in an online focus group discussion. The key constructivist elements of knowledge construction, cooperative learning and the use of authentic learning were found to positively contribute to student learning in the online environment, while the findings for the fourth key element, (4) self-regulated learning did not support this subconstruct. Collaborative activities such as working in teams was clearly the most important element cited by students as contributing to their learning, indicating that collaborative learning is a critical instructional element. Working with an actual local public health agency on a community assessment project was also cited by students as being important to their learning, suggesting that authentic learning is also effective. Evidence supporting the positive role constructivist elements can play in student learning was supported in both correlational analysis of the questionnaires and in the focus group discussion.

 
AdviserRita O'Sullivan
SchoolTHE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL
SourceDAI/A 71-05, p. , Jun 2010
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsPublic health occupations education; Adult education; Educational technology; Higher education
Publication Number3403250
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3403250
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.