Willingness of nurses to learn with the use of technology: An exploratory mixed-methods investigation
by Pilcher, Jobeth, Ed.D., NORTHCENTRAL UNIVERSITY, 2010, 153 pages; 3401553

Abstract:

An increasing number of technologically enhanced tools are becoming available to meet the ongoing professional development needs of nurses. Only a few studies have addressed nurses' willingness to learn with technology, resulting in the problem of inadequate evidence to guide best practices for technology incorporation into nursing professional development. The purpose of this study was to explore nurses' willingness to use technology for educational purposes. The study was approached using mixed methodology, with interviews providing the qualitative strategy of inquiry. A non-experimental survey design was used for quantitative data collection. Participants included 199 nurses from six neonatal intensive care units in Texas. Nurses of all ages reported a willingness to learn with a variety of technological tools. ANOVA findings revealed that older nurses were more willing to learn with lecture ( F (2,183) = 3.25, p .041), paper and pencil self-study ( F (2,183) = 7.89, p .001), and online education ( F (2, 181) = 3.74, p .026), as compared to younger nurses. No significant differences between the age groups were demonstrated in relation to learning with realistic simulations or with video or audio technologies. Interview participants specified that willingness and preferences were not the same. Predominant preferences included lecture, interactive learning, and realistic simulations. Interview participants identified ease of use, familiarity, convenience, and benefit as primary factors influencing their willingness to learn with technology. Recommendations include the need to seek participant input, to offer a variety of learning options, and to employ easy-to-use learning tools. Additional research is needed regarding nurses' technology-related learning preferences and to measure the impact of nurses' learning experiences on patient outcomes.

 
AdviserLaurie Bedford
SchoolNORTHCENTRAL UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/A 71-03, p. , May 2010
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsAdult education; Nursing; Health education; Educational technology
Publication Number3401553
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3401553
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.