Writing Ethics in the Writing Major: Rhetorical applications for plagiarism pedagogies in the collaborative age
by Ragusa, Daniela Antonina, Ph.D., UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND, 2009, 236 pages; 3401125

Abstract:

Due to the impact of online collaborative writing technologies on the field of Writing, an ethical dilemma exists in reconciling discrepancies between an evolving concept of authorship and competing definitions of plagiarism. My project argues for the curricular inclusion of an interdisciplinary course in Writing that bridges Composition to English Education as it examines important questions raised by uses of technology in the classroom. My project includes extensive literature reviews on authorship, technoliteracy, and plagiarism, as well as an attitudinal research study used to collect data from directors and coordinators of undergraduate Writing Major programs across the country Research participants were asked their opinions on the importance of forming a writer's identity through the study of authorship as an evolving concept, the practice of online collaborative writing technologies, the use of pedagogy to inquire into plagiarism, in order to study the ethical issues tied to writing. While research results demonstrate varying levels of agreement among respondents on most survey statements, there was one hundred percent agreement on the necessity of studying ethics. Therefore, my project culminates in the creation of a complete capstone course in the Writing Major for students majoring in Writing or English Education. This final project requires them to work collaboratively in rewriting policy and redefining plagiarism to teach others what they have learned, thus enacting a new cultural reproduction of Writing as a discipline within the Composition/Rhetoric and English Education fields. I also argue that as a result of taking "Writing Ethics," undergraduate Writing majors' experience as policy makers and educators help form their writers' identities and contribute to their awareness of ethical issues tied to writing so as to create a credible ethos. In discussing future implications of my project, I propose to expand my original study to extend further into undergraduate Writing Major programs, exploring them as offering different and competing approaches to plagiarism pedagogy.

 
Advisor
SchoolUNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND
SourceDAI/A 71-03, p. , Apr 2010
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsLanguage arts; Ethics; Rhetoric
Publication Number3401125
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3401125
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.