Practicing what we teach: Effective professional development for educators
by Trehearn, Mary K., Ed.D., COLLEGE OF SAINT MARY, 2010, 155 pages; 3398889

Abstract:

The purpose of this study was to examine professional development in three Nebraska public schools. For decades, the issue of professional development has been dissected, often resulting in unhealthy opposition between faculty and administration. Numerous studies have been conducted on teacher education, often with inconclusive or conflicting results. A review of literature illustrates how professional development has evolved through time, describing how governance, the role of the administration, strategic planning, and budget all affect the success of teacher education. This research study scrutinized four major themes that emerged as having direct influence on professional development for participating teachers: (1) shared responsibilities, (2) the roles of administrators and teachers, (3) forethought and preparation, and (4) expenditures. Methods and procedures of the dissertation study are detailed. Designed to be retrospective in nature, this investigation sought greater understanding of how teachers and administrators perceived the effectiveness of professional development in their schools. Because of the brevity of the study, proposal of extreme changes to professional development is not intended. Rather, the study is intended to corroborate similar studies’ findings or perhaps reveal new insights in the field. Findings of the study are scrutinized and interpretation of those findings show correlations to the review of literature and the aforementioned emerging themes. Conclusions include a comparison/contrast of teacher and administrator perspectives as well as a discussion on implications of the study and recommendations for future research.

Keywords. professional development, staff development, teacher education, learning communities, collaboration, governance, roles of the administrator

 
AdviserLois Linden
SchoolCOLLEGE OF SAINT MARY
SourceDAI/A 71-05, p. , May 2010
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsEducational leadership; Teacher education; Curriculum development
Publication Number3398889
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3398889
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.