The effects of program structure on dissertation writing in "online academia": A qualitative analysis of online doctoral student experiences
by Goodwin-Lee, Regina, Ph.D., WALDEN UNIVERSITY, 2010, 110 pages; 3398230

Abstract:

Writing the dissertation can be one of the most stressful experiences in the doctoral education experience. Previous research findings indicate that traditional psychology doctoral candidates (PDC) identify the graduate school experience, and the dissertation process in particular as stress-inducing, isolating and key obstacles to graduation. There remains, however, an important gap in the literature that specifically addresses such experiences for the distance learner (DL). Therefore, the purpose of this research was to investigate the effect of perceived stress, isolation, and program structure on PDCs preparing dissertations in the DL environment. Using a phenomenological approach with Bandura’s Social and Vicarious learning theories as frameworks the lived experiences of 10 PDCs from Walden University, a DL institution, were recorded from semi-structured interview data. The PDC perceptions about various aspects of the DL dissertation experience, including the efficacy of the current structured dissertation course format, stress and isolation for online learners writing dissertations were revealed. Responses were thematically coded and analyzed with resultant data about the inherent value of having compatible mentoring faculty, local support groups, a designated work plan and area for completing the research described. Findings from this research help clarify students’ expectations and perceptions about the dissertation process. This research is an important contribution to the existing literature because it provides data about the dissertation process using the voice and perspectives of people intimately familiar with this experience. It enhances social change initiatives by encouraging and educating doctoral students and others about the importance of being adequately prepared to make informed research decisions, seek adequate support and advocate for improved course guidelines during the dissertation writing process.

 
AdviserTiffany Rush-Wilson
SchoolWALDEN UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/B 71-04, p. , May 2010
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsBehavioral sciences; Clinical psychology; Educational technology; Higher education
Publication Number3398230
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3398230
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.