An exploratory pretest and posttest investigation of the effects of the self-regulated strategy development approach to writing instruction on middle school boys' writing achievement
by Sperger, Diane Rooney, Ed.D., UNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD, 2010, 180 pages; 3397856

Abstract:

This exploratory investigation examined the effect of instruction in the Self-Regulated Strategy Development (SRSD; Harris & Graham, 1996) writing approach on suburban seventh and eighth grade boys' writing achievement. Over a two-week period, the researcher provided seventh and eighth grade language arts teachers (N = 7) from TRMS, a suburban middle school, with six hours of professional development in the SRSD writing approach. Following the training, teachers administered a released Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) persuasive writing prompt as a pretest to 332 students. Over the next six weeks, teachers then instructed the students in the SRSD writing approach. During the instruction phase, the researcher met with teachers for one hour every week to discuss the implementation of the instruction and the challenges and successes with the process. Additionally, the researcher observed each teacher one time per week for 10 minutes to monitor the fidelity of implementation of instruction. At the end of the six weeks of instruction, teachers administered a released CMT persuasive writing prompt as the measure of students' achievement.

Results indicate that for both boys and girls, at all grade levels, the mean posttest score was significantly higher than the mean pretest score. No significant differences were observed between boys' and girls' mean scores on either the pretest or the posttest. Despite significant improvements in both boys' and girls' writing achievement, there is no real way to know whether instruction in the SRSD writing approach (Harris & Graham, 1996) had any effect on either group. This question remains because neither random assignment of subjects nor control group was used in this study.

Notably, there were no significant differences observed in the mean for boys' and girls' pretest and posttest scores on released CMT persuasive writing prompts. This result is counter to national trends in assessment of students 'writing (Clark, Oakley, & Adams, 2006; Kafer, 2004). Analyses of cumulative data revealed that girls continue to outscore boys in writing.

 
AdviserDiana LaRocco
SchoolUNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD
SourceDAI/A 71-04, p. , Apr 2010
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsReading instruction; Curriculum development
Publication Number3397856
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3397856
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.