Psychological ownership and ownership markers in collaborative working environment
by Wang, Qian Ying (Jane), Ph.D., STANFORD UNIVERSITY, 2010, 170 pages; 3395862

Abstract:

Ownership is a fundamental human concern. It has been explored by various disciplines and within a variety of contexts. However, previous ownership researches focus primarily on physical objects such as toys, houses and stamps, while almost no research has been conducted about the psychological ownership toward digital entities. This dissertation studies the psychological aspects of digital ownership. A conceptual model of ownership and ownership indicators is summarized first. Next, ownership marking, a behavioral manifestation that is closely tied with psychological ownership, is introduced and discussed, followed by the presentation of two experimental studies that investigated the effects of digital ownership and ownership markers on owners/users.

Study 1 examined how the similarities and differences between two of the most widely-used ownership markers—communicative and defensive markers—affect users' perception and performance. A 2 (communicative marker: present vs. absent) by 2 (defensive marker: present vs. absent) by 2 (gender of dyad: male vs. female), between-participants design (N = 88) was used for this study. Results show that ownership markers had a strong impact on users' behaviors and attitudes, and communicative markers influenced users' attitudes more than defensive markers did.

Study 2 (N = 64) further investigated contextual factors that influenced the emergence and development of ownership. A 2 (social context: cooperation vs. competition) by 2 (ownership marker: present vs. absent) by 2 (gender of dyad: male vs. female), between-participants design was used. This second study identified the effects of similarity on users' behavior and attitudes between the competitive context and ownership markers. Markers had a strong negative impact on group collaboration.

The dissertation ends with the discussion of implications for the design of computer-supported group work. Directions for future research are also suggested.

 
Advisor
SchoolSTANFORD UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/A 71-01, p. , Mar 2010
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsManagement; Experimental psychology; Information science; Computer science
Publication Number3395862
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3395862
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.