Perceived social support as a buffer against the manifestation of depressive symptoms for peer victims
by Tanigawa, Diane Akiko, Ph.D., UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA, 2009, 112 pages; 3395243

Abstract:

Consequences of depression can be detrimental, and adolescents who are victimized by their peers are at-risk for developing depressive symptoms. The link between depression and peer victimization is relatively strong, but social support may be a protective factor for peer victims. The main purpose of this study was to examine the buffering effects of perceived social support from various sources against the manifestation of depressive symptoms for peer victims. Five hundred forty-four 7th and 8th graders from 3 middle schools completed a survey assessing depressive symptoms, peer victimization experiences, and perceived social support from parents, teachers, classmates, and a close friend. Perceived social support from parents and perceived social support from a close friend were found to buffer the manifestation of depressive symptoms for male peer victims. No buffering effects were found for female peer victims.

A secondary goal of this study was to investigate whether a perceived power disadvantage with the perpetrator (i.e., the victims' perception that the perpetrator is more popular, smarter, or physically stronger than they) would identify a more vulnerable subgroup of peer victims. Students who experienced frequent peer victimization and a perceived power disadvantage with their perpetrator did not differ significantly from students who experienced frequent peer victimization and no perceived power disadvantage with their perpetrator on depressive symptoms and perceived social support from parents, teachers, and a close friend. Implications of these findings, limitations of the study, and future directions are discussed.

 
AdviserMichael Furlong
SchoolUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA
SourceDAI/A 71-02, p. , Apr 2010
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsMiddle school education; School counseling; Counseling psychology; Clinical psychology
Publication Number3395243
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3395243
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.