Addressing sources of bias in genetic association studies
by Miclaus, Kelci Jo, Ph.D., NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY, 2009, 105 pages; 3395234

Abstract:

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have become a popular method for the discovery of genetic variants associated with complex diseases or traits. As the size and scope of these studies increase in order to obtain higher power for determining significant associations, careful consideration of population structure becomes paramount. If individuals in a study come from different ethnic or ancestral backgrounds, variation in allele frequencies and disproportionate ancestry representation in cases and controls can lead to inflated Type I error rates. Over the years, several methods for controlling population stratification have been introduced, many of which rely on the use of multivariate dimension reduction methods. An important aspect of population stratification is to determine which loci exhibit evidence of population allele frequency differences. We introduce a method based on Hardy-Weinberg Disequilibrium to find substructure-informative markers coupled with the use of nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling (NMDS) in order to visualize population structure in a sample. We extend the use of NMDS in conjunction with nonparametric clustering to develop a test for association that corrects for population stratification. We show that NMDS is a preferable visualization technique for detecting multiple levels of relatedness within a set of individuals and that the subsequent test correction model is a more powerful test under realistic scenarios. Recent research has shown that technical bias due to differential genotyping errors between cases and controls can also inflate the Type I error rate, possibly an even more severe source of bias in GWAS. Current genotype calling algorithms rely on processing samples in batches due to computational constraints as well as concerns of differences in DNA collection, lab preparation and heterogeneous samples that can skew results of genotype calls. This thesis also addresses possible bias caused by differential genotyping due to batch size and composition effects for the widely used BRLMM algorithm recommended for the Affymetrix GeneChip Human Mapping 500 K array set. Samples obtained from the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium are utilized to determine differential results due to genotype calling batch differences.

 
AdvisersRuss Wolfinger; Jason Osborne
SchoolNORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/B 71-03, p. , Mar 2010
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsBiostatistics; Genetics; Statistics
Publication Number3395234
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3395234
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.