The effects of polychronic choice on fuzzy trace theory's false memory during decision making
by Dilley, Colin M., Ph.D., WALDEN UNIVERSITY, 2010, 315 pages; 3391466

Abstract:

Fuzzy trace theory posits that general memories, known as gist, may produce false memories. Yet the process of how exactly false memory may affect the validity of decision making is not well-understood. The purpose of this study was first, to determine the extent up to which certain decision-making categories in a multinational corporation may be influenced by false memory, second, to identify under what conditions of temporal preferences and pressures false memories are most likely to occur, and third, to know whether polychronic or monochronic employees – i.e. those that prefer multitasking as opposed to those who prefer doing one thing at a time are more susceptible to false memory. Through a case study and survey, the research identified then ranked decision-making categories by their potential to generate false memory. A scatter graph of personal time use preference was plotted against the time use required by their work task that helped determine which particular decision making categories were preferred under different types of temporal preferences and pressures. Using the Kruskal Wallis test, comparison of temporal match and mismatch confirmed that under certain temporal conditions polychronic employees tend to use more gist-influenced decision making than monochronic employees. The research is expected to facilitate positive social change through an increased understanding by business leaders of how temporal work preferences and pressures influence decision making. This should increase their awareness of the validity and reliability of the corporate decision-making processes, improve the quality of decisions they make, and consequently enhance their competitive advantage.

 
AdviserThomas Spencer
SchoolWALDEN UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/A 71-03, p. , Apr 2010
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsBusiness; Organization theory; Organizational behavior
Publication Number3391466
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3391466
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.