Writing for real: A phenomenological study of urban students' experiences writing for publication
by Holloman, Sherrish, Ed.D., TEACHERS COLLEGE, COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY, 2009, 245 pages; 3388716

Abstract:

In 1975, Newsweek published the article "Why Johnny Can't Write" which advocated for a back-to-basics movement in education and challenged researchers, scholars, and practitioners to re-examine the most effective methods for writing instruction. The Dartmouth Conference took place in 1966 prior to the Newsweek article and has been heralded as the major event that encouraged a shift in attention to the process of writing. In the four-plus decades since these two events took place, several studies have been conducted on the process and post-process movement as well as on the role of audience and publishing. However, missing from the literature is the experience of students as they write. Understanding their experiences with writing has the potential to inform writing practice and writing instruction.

This study used van Manen's (1990) Human Science Approach to interpret the meaning of the post-publication experiences of secondary urban students as they wrote for publication. In this instance, publication is a book that is produced by the Student Press Initiative (SPI) at Teachers College, Columbia University. The research question—What is the "essence" of the experience for students of writing for publication in an SPI project—was a deliberate attempt to bring the students' voice to the existing research on writing and publication. The ultimate aim of this study was to uncover the meaning and acquire a deeper understanding of the meaning or essence of writing for publication in an SPI project. The 10 participants were a mix of high school and college students, all from the South Bronx, all of whom contributed to a publication within 6-24 months prior to this study. Using a phenomenological design, data were collected primarily during multiple interviews with each participant and focus groups with them. From these data, multiple themes emerged and those presented in this dissertation that have the greatest implications for practice and best articulate how students experienced writing for publication in an SPI project.

 
AdviserRuth Vinz
SchoolTEACHERS COLLEGE, COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/A 71-01, p. , Mar 2010
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsLanguage arts; Secondary education; Rhetoric
Publication Number3388716
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3388716
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.