Relative deprivation among low wage workers: Is the grass always greener?
by Saturay, Stacy Lynn, Ph.D., UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOULDER, 2009, 174 pages; 3387526

Abstract:

In this dissertation, I look at differences in the experiences of individual and group relative deprivation among low wage workers and higher wage earners, as well as the referent choice preferences for workers of different earning classes. I studied the effects of underemployment on referent choice, individual relative deprivation, and group relative deprivation. I also examined the effect contact with higher earning classes had on feelings of individual relative deprivation. Finally, I conducted an exploratory analysis to see if low wage earners and higher wage earners experienced individual relative deprivation as a result of different facets of their work. The results indicate that individual income is a significant predictor of experiences of individual as well as group relative deprivation, and that individual income does not significantly predict choice of referent. Underemployment was a significant predictor of individual as well as group relative deprivation as well, with those individuals who reported higher levels of underemployment also reporting higher levels of individual and group relative deprivation. The exploratory analysis revealed that the facets of work that elicited feelings of individual relative deprivation were in fact different for low wage earners and higher wage earners, with lower wage earners primarily feeling resentful about meeting their basic needs and maintaining work. Higher wage earners were primarily resentful about the availability of work and the ability to have their voices heard at work. Theoretical implications and practical contributions, as well as limitations are also discussed.

 
AdviserJoseph G. Rosse
SchoolUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOULDER
SourceDAI/A 71-01, p. , Jan 2010
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsManagement
Publication Number3387526
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3387526
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.