Assessing effects of four interviewer variables on employment interview structure
by Bagg, D. Robert (Bob), Ph.D., NORTHCENTRAL UNIVERSITY, 2009, 252 pages; 3385330


The purpose of this research was to determine if there were relationships between four interviewer-centric variables and the level of interview structure interviewers applied to their interviews. The survey was designed to elicit individual respondent behaviors and attitudes related to these four variables, as well as ascertain the level of structure they employed. The four independent variables were: the desire on behalf of interviewers for flexibility; the perceived importance of interviewer training; the self-confidence of interviewers in their own skills; and the amount of training respondents had received. The dependent variable was the level of interview structure. Selected scales in the survey were designed to determine level of structure as defined in the research literature. The survey instrument was a Likert-type five-point electronic questionnaire, and participation was invited from over 2000 human resource practitioners across Canada, with the final completed surveys comprising 230 respondents (test power = .999). Results of multiple regression analysis indicated that desire for flexibility (p=.000) and perceived importance of training (p=.000) were statistically significant with a negative (inverse) relationship to structure. Interviewer self-confidence (p=.151) was not statistically significant and had no measurable impact on structure. For amount of interviewer training, post hoc tests indicated interviewers with the largest amount of training (75+ hours) were significantly (p=.014) more in favor of structured interviews than were those with much lower levels of training. Therefore, the first, second, and fourth null hypotheses were rejected, and the third null hypothesis was retained. Implications are that some interviewer-centric factors do have an effect on interview structure. Recommendations include further study of factors that may impact employment interview structure.

AdviserDaljit Singh
SourceDAI/A 70-11, Dec 2009
Source TypeDissertation
Publication Number3385330
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.