Social functioning, boundary disturbance, and hostility in Roman Catholic priest pedophiles and ephebophiles
by Lagan, Hugh D., Psy.D., MASSACHUSETTS SCHOOL OF PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 141 pages; 3382660

Abstract:

An archival study was designed to examine differences in social functioning, boundary disturbance and hostility among sex offending and non-offending Roman Catholic priests as measured by the Rorschach Inkblot Method (RIM). The sex offending priests were divided into two groups: Pedophiles (N=73) and Ephebophiles (N=64). The control group (N=79) consisted of randomly sampled priests, none of whom reported any history of sexual offense.

Results of several Univariate Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc analysis indicated that offending priests showed significantly higher impaired object relations, internalized aggressive impulses and interpersonal boundary disturbance compared to non-offenders. Additionally, pedophile priests were significantly more likely to identify with the role of aggressor and have difficulties managing aggressive impulses than ephebophile priests and non-offending priests.

Chi-square analysis found that pedophile priests reported significantly higher frequencies of unusual texture responses, difficulties distinguishing fantasy from reality and more distorted social perceptions.

Findings supported previous research which has identified intimacy deficits, passive-dependence, chronic emotional loneliness, negative internalized emotions and the depersonalization of others as pro-offending risk factors among child molesters. The Rorschach differences identified in this study add to our knowledge base regarding characteristics of clergy sex offenders.

 
AdviserBrian D. Ott
SchoolMASSACHUSETTS SCHOOL OF PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY
SourceDAI/B 70-10, p. , Dec 2009
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsClerical studies; Clinical psychology; Personality psychology; Criminology
Publication Number3382660
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3382660
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.