Empirical comparison of graph classification and regression algorithms
by Ketkar, Nikhil S., Ph.D., WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY, 2009, 114 pages; 3382104

Abstract:

Several domains are inherently structural; relevant data cannot be represented as a single table without significant loss of information. The development of predictive models in such domains becomes a challenge as traditional machine learning algorithms which deal with attribute-valued data cannot be used. One approach to develop predictive models in such domains is to represent the relevant data as labeled graphs and treat subgraphs of these graphs as features on which to base the predictive model.

The general area of this research is the development of predictive models for such domains. Specifically, we target domains which are readily modeled as sets of separate graphs (rather than a single graph) and on the tasks of binary classification and regression on such graphs. An example would be learning a binary classification model that distinguishes between aliphatic and aromatic compounds or a regression model for predicting the melting points of chemical compounds.

The contributions of this work include a comprehensive comparison of current approaches to graph classification and regression to identify their strengths and weaknesses, the development of novel pruning mechanisms in the search for subgraph features for the graph regression problem, the development of a new algorithm for graph regression called gRegress and the application of current approaches in graph classification and regression to various problems in computational chemistry.

Our empirical results indicate that our pruning mechanisms can bring about a significant improvement in the search for relevant subgraph features based on their correlation with each other and the target, sometimes by an order of magnitude. Our empirical results also indicate that gRegress addresses a key weakness in the current work on graph regression, namely, the need for a combination of linear models.

 
AdviserLawrence B. Holder
SchoolWASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/B 70-11, p. , Dec 2009
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsArtificial intelligence; Computer science
Publication Number3382104
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3382104
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.