Evaluating amphibian occurrence models and the importance of small, isolated wetlands in the Delaware water gap national recreational area
by Julian, James T., Ph.D., THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, 2009, 181 pages; 3380926

Abstract:

Isolated wetlands lack permanent stream connections to adjacent bodies of water, and are ecologically important because they can be the most abundant type of wetland in a region, and can harbor unique biological communities. Despite this, isolated wetlands are rarely protected by federal and state legislation, and federal agencies do not assess their abundance when reporting national trends in wetland losses. In this dissertation, I present the results from a field study that illustrates how the presence of small and isolated wetlands is important in maintaining populations of pond-breeding amphibians across the Delaware Water Gap National Recreational Area located in New Jersey and Pennsylvania. I found that stream connections at wetlands strongly influenced the occurrence patterns of five out of nine amphibian species studied, and species that bred earlier in the year were the most likely to occur at small and isolated wetlands. I used occurrence patterns at surveyed wetlands to predict the presence of amphibian species across the entire study area, and estimated that two-thirds of all species would lose at least half of their breeding sites if either isolated wetlands or small wetlands (< 0.30 ha in size) were removed from this landscape. I also characterized the abundance and sizes of isolated and non-isolated wetlands that could serve as amphibian breeding sites, and modeled the probability these wetlands were detected on wetland maps as a function of their size. I found the majority of wetlands were small (< 0.5 ha) and isolated, and this trend was similar to several landscapes in the northeastern United States. Thus, if these landscapes were to follow national trends in wetlands loss, approximately 21 wetlands smaller than 0.5 ha could be degraded or destroyed for every wetland larger than 0.5 ha. Furthermore, I estimate this disparity could be twice as large because the rate small wetlands in this study area were included on wetland maps was considerably lower than inclusion rates for larger wetlands.

 
AdviserRobert P. Brooks
SchoolTHE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/B 70-11, p. , Dec 2009
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsEcology; Zoology; Forestry
Publication Number3380926
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3380926
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.