Parental beliefs and the socialization of child emotion: The role of child risk and parent gender
by Baker, Jason K., Ph.D., THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, 2007, 125 pages; 3380710

Abstract:

This study examined links between parental beliefs regarding emotion (attitudes, priorities, and perceptions), and parental socialization of emotion behaviors. Child developmental risk and parent gender were examined as important to these relations. Participants included 165 families of 8-year-old children with (n = 67) and without (n = 98) early developmental delays. Beliefs were measured through questionnaire and interview measures, and parenting behaviors were evaluated through parents' reports of their reactions to child emotion, parent ratings of family expressiveness, and observations of parents' emotion coaching and emotion focus during parent-child laboratory discussion. Fathers were found to be less emotion supportive than mothers as per self-report, but not in terms of observed behavior. Based on developmental status-group assignment at either age 3 or 5 years, parental emotion-coaching attitudes were positively related to several supportive parenting behaviors for parents of typically developing children, and for fathers of children with delays. Mothers of children with delays did not show any significant belief-behavior links when the child age-3 status assignment was considered, but links between priorities and parenting emerged with consideration of the age-5 years assignment. Priorities did not exhibit many simple relations to parenting, but attitudes moderated some priority-behavior links. Support was generated for the existence of diagnostic overshadowing within families of children with delays, but no differences were found in the behavior of these parents as compared to families of typically developing children. Proposed models of belief-behavior links resulted in good overall fit, after negative-expressiveness was omitted. Implications for the study of parental emotion socialization and for parent training are discussed.

 
AdvisersKeith A. Crnic; Pamela M. Cole
SchoolTHE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/B 70-11, p. , Dec 2009
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsDevelopmental psychology; Clinical psychology; Individual & family studies
Publication Number3380710
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3380710
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.