Assessing direct practice skill performance in undergraduate social work education using standardized clients and self reported self-efficacy
by Rawlings, Mary A., Ph.D., CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY, 2008, 176 pages; 3375071

Abstract:

Entering and exiting Bachelor of Social Work students were compared to determine if participation in an accredited BSW program predicted both higher social work direct practice skill and higher direct practice self-efficacy, while controlling for experience and intent to enter direct practice. Direct practice self-efficacy was examined as both a predictor of direct practice skill and as a mediator of the relationship between BSW education and direct practice skill. Entering BSW students were compared with exiting BSW students on self-efficacy and skill performance. Direct practice skill was assessed by rating student performance in a fifteen minute initial assessment interview with a standardized client. Direct practice self-efficacy was assessed using the Social Work Direct Practice Self-Efficacy Scale, incorporating items from the Social Work Self-Efficacy Scale and the Helping Skill Self-Efficacy Scale. Ordinary least squares hierarchical regression found BSW education to be predictive of both higher direct practice skill and higher direct practice self-efficacy. Self-efficacy, however, was found to be a negative predictor of direct practice skill, after controlling for BSW education. Self-efficacy acted as a suppressor variable in mediating the relationship between education and skill. This study supports the assertion that BSW education is predictive of higher skill, suggests caution in the use of self-efficacy as a proxy measure for skill, suggests more consideration of standardized client interviews for assessment in social work, and affirms the need for further development of valid and reliable instruments for assessment of direct practice skill in social work.

 
AdviserWallace J. Gingerich
SchoolCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/A 70-09, p. , Nov 2009
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsPublic policy; Higher education
Publication Number3375071
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3375071
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.