Duplication theorem of social relationships: Does interpersonal complementarity mediate the relationship between birth order complementarity and marital adjustment?
by Stanley, Krystal L., Ph.D., THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, 2009, 89 pages; 3374544

Abstract:

This study tested whether interpersonal complementarity would mediate the relationship between birth rank complementarity (i.e., spouses have different birth ranks in their family of origin) and marital adjustment, which was originally proposed by Toman's (1993) duplication theorem of social relationships . Birth rank complementarity was indexed by categorizing couples based on the birth rank of each spouse. Interpersonal complementarity was operationalized by creating composite scores from spouse ratings of him/herself on the SASB Intrex scales, which measure interpersonal behavior in both the active and response roles of an interaction. Marital adjustment was operationalized by creating composite scores from spouse ratings on two subscales of the Marital Satisfaction Inventory-Revised (Snyder, 1997): Global Distress, which measures general satisfaction with the marital relationship; and Problem-Solving Communication, which measures a couple's ability to effectively resolve conflict. The sample was comprised of 60 heterosexual couples who were married between January and December of 2001, 2002, or 2003. The main hypothesis for the study, that interpersonal complementarity would mediate the relationship between birth rank complementarity and marital adjustment, was not supported: the direct relationship between birth rank complementarity and marital adjustment was not significant. However, findings indicated that spouse composite ratings of interpersonal complementarity predicted spouse marital adjustment, and birth rank complementarity was found to be associated with interpersonal complementarity. Directions for future research, study limitations, and implications for practice are discussed.

 
AdviserElizabeth A. Skowron
SchoolTHE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/B 70-09, p. , Nov 2009
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsSocial psychology; Clinical psychology
Publication Number3374544
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3374544
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.