Effectiveness of a clinical questioning activity in developing cardiac sonography student learning levels
by Newberry, Valerie D., Ph.D., SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY AT CARBONDALE, 2009, 170 pages; 3372553

Abstract:

The purpose of the study was to contribute to a better understanding of learning activities used in clinical education. In particular, this study aimed to investigate whether use of a question/answer (Q/A) activity in clinical learning promoted higher levels of learning. Results of this study will be beneficial to faculty in programs with a clinical component, clinical educators, employers, and to the students who participate in the programs.

The two-fold problem addressed in this research study was (a) What is the level of student learning achieved with a Q/A clinical learning activity, as perceived by clinical instructors; and (b) is the students’ perceived level of learning related to student characteristics?

The study included students and clinical instructors from accredited cardiac sonography programs in the United States. Demographic data revealed the students were mostly female with a mean age of 30 and varying levels of education.

Experts reviewed the Q/A activity for content validity and the level of Bloom’s taxonomy. The instrument was revised based on their recommendations. Program directors in 53 programs were sent requests to participate in the study and nine programs had participants who agreed to be in the study. Participants were mailed the materials and asked to complete the Q/A assignment. Clinical instructors completed a teaching module prior to giving student scores for thinking levels. The demographic sheets, consents, and score sheets were mailed back and data analysis was completed.

Findings of the study suggest the Q/A activity is successful at progressively increased means in the thinking scores of students. The teaching tutorial is adequate training for the clinical instructors on the levels of Bloom’s taxonomy. The level of thinking score achieved is compared to the student’s age, gender, and educational level with no statistically significant difference. Recommendations for practice, further research and instrumentation are discussed.

 
AdviserMarcia Anderson
SchoolSOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY AT CARBONDALE
SourceDAI/A 70-09, p. , Oct 2009
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsEducational psychology; Curriculum development; Vocational education
Publication Number3372553
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3372553
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.