Vocabulary acquisition through listening and its relation to learning channel preferences
by Sawada, Kazuya, Ed.D., TEMPLE UNIVERSITY, 2009, 188 pages; 3371998

Abstract:

The purposes of this study were to investigate the degree to which Japanese high school students acquire vocabulary from listening, what kind of explanation better promotes vocabulary acquisition, whether vocabulary acquisition through listening varies according to the participants’ learning channel preferences, and what factors best predict vocabulary that is acquired through listening. The participants, 116 second-year Japanese high school students, were taught 45 vocabulary items embedded in nine listening passages. In the control condition, no vocabulary explanation was given. In the first treatment condition, the students were provided with a spoken Japanese translation for each target word. In the second treatment condition, the students were provided with a spoken English definition of each target word.

Approximately 30 minutes after each listening session, an Immediate Recognition Posttest and a Multiple-choice Posttest were administered. Exactly the same tests were administered as Delayed Recognition and Multiple-choice Posttests 2 weeks after the instruction. Repeated-measures ANOVAs using the listening conditions as the independent variables and the results from the two tests as dependent variables showed that there was a statistically significant difference between the three conditions on the Immediate and Delayed Recognition Posttests. The L1 translation condition was more effective than the L2 definition condition, and the control condition was the least effective. However, for the Immediate and Delayed Multiple-choice Posttests, there was no statistically significant difference between the L1 and L2 conditions. Two three-way ANOVAs using the learning channel subgroups, time, and the listening conditions as independent variables, and the results from the Immediate and Delayed Recognition and Multiple-choice Posttests as dependent variables showed that there were no statistically significant differences among the three learning channel subgroups. However, the auditory learners retained more in the L2 definition condition than the visual and haptic learning channel groups. The final major analysis, a hierarchical multiple regression, indicated that passage comprehension, vocabulary size, and grammatical competence were statistically significant predictors of vocabulary acquisition through listening.

 
AdviserDavid Beglar
SchoolTEMPLE UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/A 70-09, p. , Oct 2009
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsLanguage arts; Bilingual education; Curriculum development
Publication Number3371998
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3371998
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.