Influences during student teaching on preservice teachers' attitudes toward the inclusion of students with disabilities in the general education classroom
by Huber, Jennifer J., Ph.D., CLEMSON UNIVERSITY, 2009, 293 pages; 3369259

Abstract:

The purpose of this research project was to explore the influences during fieldwork on preservice teachers’ attitudes towards the inclusion of students with disabilities in the general education classroom. An embedded, mixed-methods design was used to examine both qualitative and quantitative data. Preservice teachers completed the Opinions Relative to the Integration of Students with Disabilities (Antonak & Larrivee, 1995) survey before beginning full-time student teaching. This survey measured their attitudes towards the inclusion of students with disabilities in the general education classroom. In addition, student teachers completed the Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy Scale (Tschannen-Moran & Hoy, 2001) prior to their full time student teaching. During the qualitative, explanatory phase, observational, artifact, and interview data were examined from selected participants in their student teaching practicum. Participants for the qualitative phase were selected based on their initial scores on the Opinions Relative to the Integration of Students with Disabilities survey. Three special educators and three general educators who scored lowest on the scale, indicating negative attitudes about inclusive practices, were chosen to participate in the qualitative exploration. In addition, three special educators and three general educators who scored highest on the scale, indicating support for inclusion, were chosen to complete the qualitative participant group. Finally, after student teaching was completed, all participants were administered both surveys again to determine changes in attitudes responsive to their student teaching experience. Findings indicated that preservice teacher attitudes changed significantly after student teaching and that there were significant differences between special education and general education participants. Although preservice teachers’ self-efficacy significantly increased after fieldwork, their self-efficacy was not correlated to their attitudes about inclusion. The participants’ attitudes before student teaching accounted for most of their attitudes after student teaching, although the preservice teachers indicated their cooperating teacher was also very influential. Personal experience with individuals with disabilities and type of disability, severity of disability, and age of the student were all influencing factors of the preservice teachers’ attitudes about inclusion of students with disabilities in the general education classroom. Overall, participants’ attitudes fell along a continuum, with some preservice teachers ambivalent or undecided, while others were negative or positive about inclusive practices.

 
AdvisersVivian I. Correa; Janie Hodge
SchoolCLEMSON UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/A 70-08, p. , Sep 2009
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsSpecial education; Teacher education
Publication Number3369259
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3369259
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.