Discriminating between putative orbitofrontal and dorsolateral-prefrontal profiles using the Personality Assessment Inventory
by Harkins, Kevin Michael, Ph.D., NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY, 2009, 114 pages; 3368474

Abstract:

The integration of cognitive neuroscience with neuropsychology has been advocated (Stuss & Levine, 2002). Lichter and Cummings’ (2001) description of “circuit specific behavioral syndromes” suggested that an “orbitofrontal (OF) syndrome” could be discriminated from a “dorsolateral-prefrontal (DLPF) syndrome,” based on a theoretical model of frontal-subcortical circuits. Using Morey’s (1991) Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI), a cluster variate of antisocial features, aggression, mania, and obsessive-compulsive behavior was selected to partition a diagnostically heterogeneous, archival sample of clinic-referred college students (N = 22) using cluster analysis. A two-group cluster solution emerged from the results of combined hierarchical-agglomerative and iterative partitioning procedures, potentially corresponding to the putative OF and DLPF classifications. The “OF profile group” obtained significantly higher scores on self-report measures of antisocial features, aggression, mania/hypomania, and obsessive-compulsive behavior than the “DLPF profile group.” External validation of the cluster solution employing univariate logistic regression analyses suggested the DLPF profile group performed more poorly than the OF profile group on measures of sustained attention and spatial working memory, and the OF profile group performed more poorly than the DLPF profile group on a measure of color naming. Utilizing the PAI in conjunction with neuropsychological tests to assist in identifying OF and DLPF neurobehavioral profiles is suggested. Implications for treatment and academic accommodations for clinic-referred college students are discussed.

 
AdviserCarmen G. Armengol
SchoolNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/B 70-08, p. , Sep 2009
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsClinical psychology; Personality psychology; Quantitative psychology and psychometrics; Cognitive psychology
Publication Number3368474
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3368474
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.