Altering beginning teachers' beliefs and practices regarding the labeling of low track students: The role of mentor-initiated reframing
by Hermann, Adele Christina, Ph.D., UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA CRUZ, 2009, 225 pages; 3367723

Abstract:

Researchers have identified the negative effects of labeling associated with curricular tracking. Using a variety of theoretical perspectives, researchers have also suggested how the formal, structural role of tracking was established and has persisted despite strong evidence that tracking and attendant labeling of students negatively affects the academic performance of students in lower tracks. This study documents the extent to which new teachers engage in the negative labeling of low track students and explores the ways in which mentors attempt to reframe new teachers' beliefs and practices regarding the labeling of low track students. The study analyzed the responses of 813 beginning teachers and 96 mentors to an on-line survey that assessed their beliefs and practices regarding tracking and labeling. In addition, 12 mentors were interviewed individually to discover the ways in which they used, or failed to use, reframing as a strategy to alter their beginning teachers' negative views of low track students.

The results of the study suggest that the negative labeling of students based on track placement is a common practice among incoming teachers. The results also indicate that beginning teachers and mentors differ on the number and type of negative labels used when describing the typical lower track student. In addition, it was found that reframing beginning teacher thinking about low track students is dependent upon the labels used by the mentors themselves and whether they discuss, or have yet to discuss, tracking, labeling or both with their beginning teachers. For mentors who are discussing tracking and/or labeling with beginning teachers the topics of discussion differ when comparing the mentors who used positive and negative labels when describing the typical lower track student themselves. The challenges mentors face when having these conversations also vary and align with their own beliefs about tracking. Overall, this study suggests that working with a qualified mentor who points out the detrimental effects of tracking and labeling may counteract the negative labeling beginning teachers often use when describing low track students.

 
AdviserRodney T. Ogawa
SchoolUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA CRUZ
SourceDAI/A 70-07, p. , Oct 2009
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsEducational psychology; Teacher education; Curriculum development
Publication Number3367723
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3367723
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.