Graduate students, negative perfectionism, perceived stress, and disordered eating behaviors
by Wilson, Carmilya, Ph.D., AUBURN UNIVERSITY, 2009, 125 pages; 3365575

Abstract:

Much of the literature on Disordered Eating Behaviors has examined their relationship with different risk factors. Among those factors examined have been perfectionism and stress. One form of perfectionism, Negative Perfectionism, involves the discrepancy or failure to meet high standards and order. There is also support for the relationship between Disordered Eating Behavior and Perceived Stress. One population presumably affected by Negative Perfectionism and Perceived Stress is graduate students. Yet, many of the existing studies on Disordered Eating Behaviors have either focused on or made primary use of individuals at the undergraduate-level and have neglected graduate student populations. Thus, the current study examined Disordered Eating Patterns within the graduate population, specifically focusing on Perceived Stress and Negative Perfectionism.

Participants were 108 female, graduate-level students, from two southern universities. The current study proposed that Negative Perfectionism, as measured by the Discrepancy Subscale of the Almost Perfect Scale-Revised (APS-R), would account for significant variation in Disordered Eating Behaviors, as measured by the three subscales (Uncontrolled Eating-UE, Cognitive Restraint-CR, and Emotional Eating-EE) of the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ-R21), above and beyond variance accounted for by Perceived Stress, As measured by the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10). Also, the current study proposed that the PSS-10 would account for significant variation in Disordered Eating Behaviors, as measured by the three subscales (UE, CR, and EE) of the TFEQ-R21, above and beyond variance accounted for by Negative Perfectionism, as measured by the Discrepancy Subscale of the APS-R. Scores on the Discrepancy Subscale accounted for a significant amount of variance on the CR and EE Subscales, above and beyond the variance accounted for by scores on the PSS-10, but not on the UE Subscale. Scores on the PSS-10 predicted a significant amount of variance on the UE and EE Subscales, above and beyond the variance accounted for by the Discrepancy Subscale, but not on the CR Subscale.

 
AdviserRandolph B. Pipes
SchoolAUBURN UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/B 70-07, p. , Aug 2009
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsMental health; Nutrition; Clinical psychology
Publication Number3365575
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3365575
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.