Designing biomedical informatics infrastructure for clinical and translational science
by La Paz Lillo, Ariel Isaac, Ph.D., UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO, 2009, 279 pages; 3364616

Abstract:

Clinical and Translational Science (CTS) rests largely on information flowing smoothly at multiple levels, in multiple directions, across multiple locations. Biomedical Informatics (BI) is seen as a backbone that helps to manage information flows for the translation of knowledge generated and stored in silos of basic science into bedside applications; however, improved communications among investigators have not been exploited to its full potential. Recognizing the needs for articulating CTS, its objectives and barriers, and identifying an architecture that harmonize the use of technology in CTS, a three-level design is proposed in this manuscript under a service oriented architecture perspective, based on the literature reviewed. In order to articulate the concepts and validate the proposition a total of 20 interviews were conducted with key informants. During the interviews a set of exercises aiming to validate the proposed CTS-BI platform architecture were conducted.

The manuscript proposes a definition of CTS that reflects the complexity of the translational process. It also identifies the objectives and barriers perceived by participants, and reports results and difficulties found in validating the architecture proposed. Overall, the partial validation of the CTS-BI platform design reflects the contribution of this work in the strategic alignment of technology to the core business of CTS Centers, while the concept of structuring functional blocks to describe the BI platform resulted difficult to validate.

The data revealed needs to further research and understand the cultural and legal incentives that today prevent the sharing of data and resources. Additionally, agents other than Academia, Healthcare Industry and Government were identified as key actors for the process of translation. Finally, respondents' opinions reflected the importance of understanding and communicating the scope of CTS, as well as testing methodologies for systematic architecture design.

 
AdviserArkalgud Ramaprasad
SchoolUNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO
SourceDAI/A 70-07, p. , Oct 2009
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsBusiness; Information science
Publication Number3364616
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3364616
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.