Men's intentions to reduce female partners' risk of HPV and cervical cancer
by Babin, Elizabeth Ann, Ph.D., ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY, 2009, 160 pages; 3364151

Abstract:

Guided largely by the extended parallel process model, three studies were conducted (two pilot studies and one main study) to determine the effects of perceived anticipated guilt and message personalization condition on men's intentions to engage in partner protective health behaviors to reduce the threat of human papillomavirus (HPV) and cervical cancer to their partner's health. The behaviors of interest in this investigation were condom use and partner communication about cervical cancer screening and the HPV vaccine. Two pilot studies preceded the main study to develop a high-threat and high-efficacy threat to other message that contained anticipated guilt and message personalization manipulations. Based on the results of the pilot study, four messages were selected for use in the main study.

In the main study, 311 men completed an online self-administered questionnaire. Message manipulation checks revealed that neither the anticipated guilt nor the message personalization manipulation produced differences in men's perceptions across message conditions, though the mean scores were in the expected direction. As hypothesized, men's self-reported perceptions of anticipated guilt were positively related to intentions to engage in health protective behavior. The data support research that suggests that anticipated emotions can influence individuals' intentions. Contrary to expectations, neither message personalization condition nor its interaction with perceptions of anticipated guilt was significantly related to men's partner protective health behavior. Though the message manipulations did not function as intended, this study provides a starting point from which future research can build on to explore the effects of anticipated guilt and message personalization on men's intentions.

 
Advisor
SchoolARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/A 70-07, p. , Sep 2009
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsCommunication
Publication Number3364151
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3364151
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.