Cognitive and metacognitive processes in grammatical subject-verb agreement problem solving of college ESL students
by Roman Spicer, Richard, Ed.D., UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO, RIO PIEDRAS (PUERTO RICO), 2009, 166 pages; 3362119

Abstract:

For a long period of time, grammar instruction has been a great issue that even today continues to frustrate teachers whose efforts to teach correct grammar usage conflict with the expectations of the general public toward the same. It has been said that even educators cannot agree on the importance of grammar instruction. Yet, regardless of the aforementioned statements, the focus of this research was placed on the students and not the teachers nor the teaching process. In particular, this study was intended to explore a difficulty students have when performing grammatical exercises where the production of agreement between the subject and the verb of a sentence is required. Despite the simplicity of the grammatical rules, students face great challenges when applying them because behind these simple descriptive rules lies a complex set of psycholinguistic issues which need to be understood.

It is for this essential reason that the purpose for this study was to provide a description of the cognitive and metacognitive processes fourth year college level ESL students engage in as they produce subject-verb agreement when performing grammar exercises. The purpose of this study had been established in order to gain a better understanding of these mental processes and to understand the strategies students employ as they perform this grammatical task.

Findings from this research indicate that the participants in the study engage in similar processes when performing subject-verb agreement exercises and also when judging their performance on the task. Even though they proceed to identify the subject and the verb in a sentence in order to determine their grammatical number and, therefore, produce agreement between these words, it was found that when there were mismatches in agreement, they were due to a significant cognitive obstacle. This obstacle consisted in not being able to accurately identify the subject in the sentences. The conclusions reached attributed these mismatches in agreement to a linguistic phenomenon known as attraction errors.

 
AdviserMaria A. Irizarry Rivera
SchoolUNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO, RIO PIEDRAS (PUERTO RICO)
SourceDAI/A 70-06, p. , Dec 2009
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsLanguage arts; Linguistics; Cognitive psychology; Curriculum development; Higher education
Publication Number3362119
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3362119
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.