UMI  
ProQuest® Dissertations & Theses
The world's most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses. Learn more...
ProQuest  
 
 
Discourse + technology/collaborative learning = fraction success
by Shea, Carol Palmer, Ed.D., ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY, 2009, 69 pages; 3360614
 

Abstract:

Recent national public policy addresses the need for strengthening mathematics problem solving, communication and reasoning for the elementary school students as stated in the National Standards written by the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM).

This study was designed to analyze the effects of working collaboratively, using technology and increasing mathematical discourse on the fraction problem solving abilities of a sixth grade mathematics class. The mathematics class, located in a suburban school setting, was introduced to working more collaboratively by being grouped in small heterogeneous groups that worked on a problem together by creating a Thinking Map (a drawing to show the steps in the process) of the sequence for a solution to a fraction problem. Students were encouraged to question each other's thinking as they grappled with their understanding of mathematics and problem solving. The class then used technology to record the steps, which had been turned into a script, for a podcast they produced for the Internet. While the class was involved with this process, the classroom discourse was enriched through the use of precise, mathematical vocabulary.

Several measures were used to demonstrate growth of the students. Scores from several state, district and local school tests were used to measure the growth of these students from the spring of fifth grade to October of their sixth grade year. A paired sample T test, run on the sixth grade pre/post test scores revealed that the difference between the means is statistically significant at 95% confidence (T=-4.323, degrees of freedom=19, p<.05). Results indicate that the ability to use precise vocabulary, display the proper sequence and solve for the correct answer, written in the lowest terms, increased. However, the district created measures remained consistent with no marked change.

 
Advisor:
School: ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY
Source: DAI-A 70/05, p. , Nov 2009
Source Type: Ed.D.
Subjects: Mathematics education; Elementary education; Educational technology; Curriculum development
Publication Number: 3360614
     
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3360614
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

 
 
 

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.il.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.



Copyright © 2007 ProQuest. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions

ProQuest