Women's learning styles: Epistemological stages and online delivery
by Payn, Lillian Sophia, Ph.D., CAPELLA UNIVERSITY, 2009, 253 pages; 3359212

Abstract:

This study explored the learning needs of women learners in community college online environments through their differences and similarities in learning styles. Learning styles were conceptualized through epistemological strategies and stages according to the learner’s life phase. The methodology implemented was: (1) a questionnaire that provided data for correlations of age, level of education, and epistemological stage and (2) qualitative cross-sectional in-depth interviews that provided data for multiple case study analysis. The study’s theoretical framework and instrumentation were derived from the Measure of Epistemological Reflection. Findings from this study suggest that results from the MER questionnaire were inconsistent with previous studies; age correlated to Role of Peers (χ2(3) = 12.16, p = .007) and Role of the Learner domains (χ2(4) = 14.30, p = .006), though not to other domains; the level of education and reasons for enrolling in online courses did not correlate to Epistemological Stages. Gender-related reasoning patterns were evident in this study; 90% of the survey and 83% of the interview categories reflected language that expressed an alignment with their gender-related reasoning patterns. An emerging trend is the transformational learning in the online environment that the majority of the participants reported. Knowledge gained from this study will have the potential to impact strategies for delivering online learning to women, basic theory of online learning, and policy for addressing gender and age-specific needs in higher education.

 
AdviserAdrienne Gibson
SchoolCAPELLA UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/A 70-06, p. , Jul 2009
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsCommunity college education; Women's studies; Adult education; Educational psychology; Educational technology
Publication Number3359212
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3359212
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.