State intervention and business group performance in China's transition economy
by Chen, Xinxiang, Ph.D., UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA, 2009, 149 pages; 3358607

Abstract:

The issue of effects of state intervention on economic development, especially in transition economy, has long been debated and remains unsettled. Beyond the old free market vis-à-vis state intervention debate, after reviewing related theories, this study examines the contingent nature of state intervention affecting business group performance in the context of transition economy by identifying different modes of state intervention in China's transitional economy. Using the data on China's 76 business groups collected in 2006, and methods such as logistic regression model, OLS regression model, and MIMIC model, the study finds that, at the group level, modes of state intervention have different economic effects on business group performance, depending on the specific modes of intervention and the context of institutional environment in China's transitional economy. Through direct intervention such as ownership and officials and Chinese Communist Party members at the group level, state failed to provide positive economic effects. In other words, these kinds of modes of state interventions make business group perform less well economically in current China's institutional context. However, the result demonstrates the state ability to provide positive economic effects by matching the functional demands of market in the emerging market such as loans from state-controlled banks as financial support. The interaction effects of party control and financial support further confirms that, with the increase of financial support from the state, high party control dramatically reduces the probability of high group performance comparing with how party control. My study contributes to the business group literature by offering a contingency perspective on how modes of state intervention affect economic performance in a specific institutional context such as China's transitional economy, moving beyond the debate between political economy perspective and developmental state theory of political sociologists and economic sociologists.

 
AdviserDavid Knoke
SchoolUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
SourceDAI/A 70-05, p. , Jul 2009
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsSocial research; Social structure; Organizational behavior
Publication Number3358607
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3358607
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.