In Texas, economically disadvantaged students account for 57% of the total population, but comprise only 23% of the population identified as gifted according to a study conducted by the Texas Equity and Excellence Task Force (Slocumb and Olenchak, 2007). This study employed a mixed-methods research design and employed the Tomlinson and Callahan model for gifted program evaluation (1994) in order to evaluate the methods for identifying gifted students in 18 urban Title I elementary schools in Texas.

Quantitative research methods were used in order to evaluate which of the research-based identification methods rated highly by a panel of experts in a prior study (Furman, 2006) were used in the gifted programs. Qualitative research methods were used in order to explore the perceptions that key school personnel involved in the identification process at the Title I campuses hold regarding how this process is implemented in their campuses. Data were collected through a questionnaire of school district gifted program directors and/or submission of electronic materials regarding the identification process, and interviews with gifted program administrators at each of the Title I campuses in the study.

The results of this study suggest that campus administrators at schools with high populations of low socioeconomic students be given more authority to place students in the gifted program that may not achieve set cutoff scores on standardized testing, but show the potential to be gifted. Additionally, parent training should be provided so that parents can understand the identification process and the value of having their children in the gifted program. School personnel should also be trained in the different cultural and socioeconomic manifestations of giftedness. There should also be shift away from identifying fully-developed skills as evidenced by the results of standardized testing to the identification of gifted potential through the results of the collection of more qualitative measures. Placement decisions should be made using a case study approach where placement is made on the merits of individual students rather than by following prescribed cutoff scores.