Nurses' perceptions of the usefulness of high fidelity simulation technology in a clinical education program
by Bux, Alex, Ed.D., UNIVERSITY OF PHOENIX, 2009, 503 pages; 3357439

Abstract:

Educational technologies, particularly simulation-based learning, are used in numerous disciplines to train employees and to improve their competencies in the workplace. In hospitals, clinical simulators have not been readily accepted as a possible solution to enhancing the clinical competencies for nurses practicing at the bedside. Traditionally, hospital continuing education programs for nurses relied on lecture-based teaching methods and objective testing instruments to evaluate learning. However, patient care issues are increasingly becoming more complex and consequently, decisions and responsibilities of nurses are requiring a higher level of clinical competence. The use of high fidelity patient simulators in hospital nurse training programs is new and is used as an innovative technology to help nurses acquire the skills and decision-making abilities to enhance the quality of patient care. Employed in the study was a mixed qualitative and quantitative design that measured learning and explored how nurses perceived the usefulness of clinical simulators as a training modality. The study's participants included nurses who received instruction on how to assess breath sounds by a clinical simulator. Quantitative data originated using a pre- and post-test one-group design during each simulation session. Qualitative data originated using focus group discussions and debriefing sessions. A convenience sample of 63 hospital-employed nurses provided the participants for the study. Shown in the study findings was a positive relationship between the use of a clinical simulator and learning outcomes. Identified in the qualitative data analysis were several themes, which indicated that nurses perceived clinical simulators to be a useful educational tool to train nurses in hospital settings.

 
AdviserKathleen Hargiss
SchoolUNIVERSITY OF PHOENIX
SourceDAI/A 70-05, p. , Jun 2009
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsEducation Health Sciences; Adult education; Educational technology; Curriculum development
Publication Number3357439
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» This is an open access dissertation.
  Use the link below to access the full text PDF of this graduate work:
  http://gradworks.umi.com/3357439.pdf
  Use the link below to search and retrieve all open access dissertations:
  http://pqdtopen.proquest.com

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.