The impact of perceived stigma on treatment adherence and self-efficacy in three chronic diseases: HIV, type II diabetes & hypertension
by Smith, Anna, Ph.D., LONG ISLAND UNIVERSITY, THE BROOKLYN CENTER, 2009, 161 pages; 3356962

Abstract:

The effect of perceived stigma on the variables of healthcare self-efficacy and treatment adherence behavior was examined in three chronic diseases of differing levels of stigmatization (HIV - high, type II diabetes - moderate, and hypertension - low), each requiring continuous adherence to a medication treatment regimen. Ninety subjects (30 in each disease group) participated. The hypothesis that perceived stigma would mediate the effect of disease group on treatment adherence and adherence self-efficacy in direct negative proportion to the differing level of stigma perceived by each group was tested using Baron & Kenny's three-step mediational analysis of covariance. No statistical support was found for the hypothesized declining linear trend in the mean scores of treatment adherence and self-efficacy, moving from the hypertension group, to the diabetes group, to the HIV group. However, when the two "more stigmatized" groups (HIV and diabetes) were pooled and compared to the "less stigmatized" group, (hypertension), the hypertension group did report significantly higher levels of treatment adherence and self-efficacy, confirming the hypothesis. A linear increase in the levels of mean perceived stigma across the three disease groups was confirmed, with the HIV group reporting the highest level of perceived stigma, followed by the diabetic group, and lastly the hypertension group. When the variable of perceived stigma was controlled for as a covariate in the third step of the analysis, the significant difference between "more" and "less stigmatized" disease groups in levels of the treatment adherence - self-efficacy composite variable was no longer found, verifying that perceived stigma mediated or caused the significant negative effect of disease group on the outcome variables. The results provide quantitative, empirical evidence that chronic disease stigma can have a direct negative impact on treatment adherence and adherence self-efficacy, supporting existing primarily qualitative research suggesting this. The study hopes to inform the development of clinical and psychosocial interventions to optimize treatment adherence for individuals living with a stigmatized chronic disease.

 
AdviserJoan Duncan
SchoolLONG ISLAND UNIVERSITY, THE BROOKLYN CENTER
SourceDAI/B 70-04, p. , Jul 2009
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsClinical psychology
Publication Number3356962
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3356962
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.