Examining the relationship between online discussion responses and learner achievement
by Jorgensen, Joan, Ph.D., CAPELLA UNIVERSITY, 2009, 142 pages; 3355341

Abstract:

Education has seen a shift from the traditional classroom setting to one that takes that same class to a new learning environment. Learners are no longer confined to the physical constraints of the traditional classroom. Instead, they are able to go outside the traditional classroom and use new technological advances to learn by meeting and collaborating in a distance learning environment. These course management systems have their own set of unique attributes that make them attractive to educational institutions, faculty and most importantly the learner. As the components of the learning process are important in any learning environment, discussion within the distance learning environment was studied to determine the relationship with academic success for the learner. Two variables examined in this study were the amount of discussion responses posted (initial and responses to other learners) and the cognitive levels achieved within initial learner discussion responses. Learner responses were counted to determine the amount of responses posted. Bloom's Taxonomy was used to determine the cognitive level achieved in the initial discussion responses posted. Chi-square was used to calculate frequency in this quantitative study. A relationship was discovered between the number of discussion responses (initial and responses to other learners) and course grade. No relationship was discovered between the cognitive levels achieved in the initial discussion responses and course grade. Instructional designers can benefit from additional research to improve online classes with effective guidelines in an attempt to increase the amount of discussion responses posted along with further exploring the relationship between cognitive levels achieved and potential critical thinking aspects with learner achievement.

 
AdviserEsther Javetz
SchoolCAPELLA UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/A 70-05, p. , Jul 2009
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsEducational technology
Publication Number3355341
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3355341
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.