Motivation and play: How faculty continue to learn new technologies
by Rodrigo, Rochelle L., Ph.D., ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY, 2009, 156 pages; 3354462

Abstract:

With the administrative push for degree programs offered in a distance-learning format, many writing programs in institutions of higher education across the United States have been required to make first-year composition courses available in a web-based, distance-learning format. The increasing number of new versions and regularly emerging new technologies demonstrate the diversity of technological teaching tools faculty may adopt, or be forced to adopt. As a result, no one disagrees with computers-and-writing scholars for promoting critical engagement with technology. Instead, a new problem has emerged: to keep up with the rate of technological change, the processes of critical engagement, incorporation, and assessment of new technologies need to be more easily and quickly adopted.

This study helps answer how a faculty member is able to keep up with technological change by collecting questionnaires and conducting interviews with faculty members from an English department at a southwest community college. As instructors of technologically mediated classes, the participants were asked about the processes they used to learn about and incorporate new technologies into their pedagogies. The data in this study suggest that faculty already teaching with technology do feel responsible for learning about new technologies. However, if institutions of higher education want to support faculty keeping up with new technologies, faculty will need continued motivation as well as adequate time and support to learn new technologies. Findings show that faculty motivation needs to focus on how the new technologies will benefit students as well as the faculty. Specifically, faculty will need support committing time and energy to "playing" with the new technologies to learn them. Data also suggest that the faculty are in a position to support one another in learning about new technologies and how to critically incorporate the technologies into their teaching practices. Context matters; however, as demonstrated by the repeated emphasis on collegial support.

 
Advisor
SchoolARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/A 70-04, p. , Aug 2009
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsRhetoric; Educational technology; Higher education
Publication Number3354462
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3354462
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.