Human 2.0? Conceptual metaphors of human beings in technologists' discourse: A study of the MIT Media Lab's Human 2.0 Symposium
by Peterson, Mary Jane, Ph.D., FIELDING GRADUATE UNIVERSITY, 2009, 215 pages; 3351801

Abstract:

As we enter the 21st century, the rate of technological change is accelerating, and the question of who we think we are is rapidly being overtaken by who we are becoming. Our tools and technologies shape us. The discourse of technologists is consequential to the kinds of social worlds we build. In order to better understand this discourse, this study applies Lakoff and Johnson's conceptual metaphor theory to a specific event, the Human 2.0 Symposium, produced by a branch of an exemplary U.S. engineering school, the MIT Media Lab. The aim is to better understand how technologists working on the cutting-edge of new developments talk about human beings. Feenberg's Critical Theory of Technology, Perez' techno-economic paradigms, and Weber's study of bureaucratic rationality form the basis for a critical reflection on this discourse. Dominant metaphors that surfaced in this study included

MAN IS A MACHINE, MIND IS A COMPUTER,

and

BRAINS R US

(

HUMANS ARE THEIR BRAINS

). Notable exceptions to these mechanistic metaphors surfaced in the discourse of the two physicians who presented at this event, Smith and Sacks. Finally, this study examines the values embedded in the conceptual metaphors chosen to describe human beings by those who are shaping the course of what humans are becoming.

Keywords: technology, critical theory, conceptual metaphor, metaphor analysis, robots, MIT Media Lab, posthuman, human 2.0

 
AdviserJeremy J. Shapiro
SchoolFIELDING GRADUATE UNIVERSITY
SourceDAI/A 70-03, p. , May 2009
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsLinguistics; Educational technology
Publication Number3351801
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3351801
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.