Regret and successful aging among the old-old
by Funderburk, Brooke, Ph.D., UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES, 2008, 357 pages; 3351748

Abstract:

Purpose. Research on successful aging (SA) lay theories examines how elders negotiate the process of aging in general, but lacks a temporal distinction regarding past versus present SA strategies. Research on regrets related to aging well can contribute to SA theory by discerning past strategies elders deem relevant to SA. Despite the theoretical relevance of regret to SA, scholars admit knowing little about age differences in regrets among elders.

Methods. This cross-sectional, mixed methods study analyzes responses to open- and closed-ended questions on elders' regrets and life satisfaction (LS) from a national survey. Content analysis is used to describe regrets among a nationally representative convenience sample of 1256 European- and African-American elders age 75 to 98. A biopsychosocial framework of elders' regret domains is compared to Rowe and Kahn's (1998) model of SA. Logistic regression is used to understand factors related to the presence, number, and content of regret, and how regret relates to LS, a psychosocial SA indicator.

Results. Most elders indicate having one to three regrets. Elders' regrets center on finances, education, health, self, work, and personal relationships. The study supports Rowe and Kahn's model of SA, but adds three new domains of Practical resources/finances, Self, and Spirituality/religiosity, and three meta-themes of retirement planning, self-actualization, and decision-making. Being younger (p ≤ .001), depressed (p ≤ .05), and having declines in money (p ≤ .001) and mobility (p ≤ .001) significantly increase the chances for regret among elders. Elders with regret have over a two times greater chance of having lower LS than elders without regret (p ≤ .05). Major findings underscore the importance of finances and retirement planning, life events, and gender to SA.

Conclusions. Social workers need to assess for regret among elders and define a professional role in retirement planning. Findings suggest a need for policy advocacy regarding income maintenance for the old-old. The study proposes a Temporal Theory of Successful Aging (TTSA) that distinguishes past from present SA domains. Future research should develop a clinical protocol for assessing and treating regret among elders and document the financial needs of the old-old amidst possible reporting stigma.

 
AdviserLene Levy-Storms
SchoolUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
SourceDAI/A 70-03, p. , May 2009
Source TypeDissertation
SubjectsGerontology; Social work; Public health; Developmental psychology
Publication Number3351748
Adobe PDF Access the complete dissertation:
 

» Find an electronic copy at your library.
  Use the link below to access a full citation record of this graduate work:
  http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl%3furl_ver=Z39.88-2004%26res_dat=xri:pqdiss%26rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation%26rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3351748
  If your library subscribes to the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database, you may be entitled to a free electronic version of this graduate work. If not, you will have the option to purchase one, and access a 24 page preview for free (if available).

About ProQuest Dissertations & Theses
With over 2.3 million records, the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) database is the most comprehensive collection of dissertations and theses in the world. It is the database of record for graduate research.

The database includes citations of graduate works ranging from the first U.S. dissertation, accepted in 1861, to those accepted as recently as last semester. Of the 2.3 million graduate works included in the database, ProQuest offers more than 1.9 million in full text formats. Of those, over 860,000 are available in PDF format. More than 60,000 dissertations and theses are added to the database each year.

If you have questions, please feel free to visit the ProQuest Web site - http://www.proquest.com - or call ProQuest Hotline Customer Support at 1-800-521-3042.